Re: poll on draft-dimitri-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-bundled-links-00.txt

[Arthi Ayyangar <arthi@juniper.net>]

Hi Dimitri,

I think the LSP_ATTRIBUTES and the corresponding bit in the
RRO Attributes Sub-object should be used.

thanks,
-arthi

> All, there is one issue that is flagged in Section 7.1 in this draft
>
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dimitri-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-bundled-links-00.txt>
>
> as needing to poll from the working group to see whether to use Session_
> Attributes or LSP_Attributes to flag component link recording and close accordingly
>
> "   If a node desires component link recording, the "Component Link
>     Recording desired" flag (value TBD) should be set in the
>     LSP_ATTRIBUTES object, object that is defined in [RSVP-TE-
>     ATTRIBUTE]. Another alternate is to use an available flag in the
>     SESSION_ATTRIBUTE object [RFC3209]. The later makes the component
>     link recording request similar to the label recording request."
>
> thanks for the feedback,
> - dimitri
>