Re: Fw: AD-review comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-egress-control

[Alex Zinin <zinin@psg.com>]

IETF Last Call requested. Thanks, Lou.

-- 
Alex
http://www.psg.com/~zinin

Monday, August 30, 2004, 1:30:13 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> Draft has been updated and resubmitted.

> Alex,
>          Thanks again for the review.

> Lou


> At 06:12 PM 8/28/2004 -0400, Adrian Farrel wrote:

>>Hi,
>>
>>The AD (Alex) has reviewed this draft and just has a couple of editorial 
>>nits.
>>If the editor (Lou) would like to make the changes and re-submit, we can 
>>get the draft to
>>go forward.
>>
>>Lou, please don't forget to run the draft through the IDnits script before 
>>submitting it.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Adrian
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Alex Zinin" <zinin@psg.com>
>>
>> > Ed: please use the new ID boilerplates.
>> >
>> > > Abstract
>> > >
>> > >    This note clarifies the procedures for the control of the label used
>> > >    on a output/downstream interface of the egress node of a Label
>> > >    Switched Path (LSP).  Such control is also known as "Egress Control".
>> > >    Support for Egress Control is implicit in Generalized Multi-Protocol
>> > >    Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling.  This note does not modify GMPLS
>> > >    signaling mechanisms and procedures and should be viewed as an
>> > >    informative clarification of GMPLS Signaling - Resource ReserVation
>> > >    Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions.
>> >
>> > Given that the doc goes STD track, I suggest that the last sentence is
>> > changed to say "This note is a clarification update to the specification
>> > of GMPLS Signaling..."
>> >
>> > > Author's Note
>> > >
>> > >    This draft is targeted for publication as a BCP.
>> >
>> > This one should be removed for the same reason.