Re: Incoming communication from the OIF

[dimitri papadimitriou <dpapadimitriou@psg.com>]

hi deborah,

Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On the second last item, even though "informational", it is very
> encouraging to hear that OIF has chosen to base it's UNI 2.0 IA on
> CCAMP's existing solution work. We should respond noting that we welcome
> the opportunity to collaborate with them and provide the updated status
> regarding GMPLS-UNI (which includes support of Ethernet and G709),
> GMPLS-G709, GMPLS-ASON, etc.

you mean bringing them the following documents:
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-overlay-05.txt>
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-08.txt>
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-rsvp-te-ason-02.txt>

could be also good to provide them with the details of RFC 3946 since it 
covers sub STS-1 signal types (hint: why only SONET is mentioned in the 
OIF liaison ?) and Ethernet (note: for the latter, i don't know if this 
is possible)

> Regards,
> Deborah
>
>
> > however planned UNI 2.0 features include
> > support of additional services including G.709, sub-STS-1 signal types
>
> and Ethernet
>
> > interfaces (using the same solutions from existing CCAMP documents).
>
>
>
> .