Re: New charter

[Tomohiro Otani <otani@kddilabs.jp>]

Hi Kireeti,

I support them rechartered in CCAMP WG and am personally
intereted in MPLS/GMPLS migration and deployment consideration
of GMPLS to accelarate actualGMPLS deployment.

CCAMP WG is suitable for discussing about L1VPN.

With best regards,

tomo

----------------------------------
Tomohiro Otani
KDDI R&D Laboratories, Inc.
----------------------------------


Kireeti Kompella wrote:

>On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>
>> If you have suggested charter updates, please send them to Adrian
>> and me.
>
>Thanks all for your input.  I have the following items; for each,
>please say "Yes" (should be added to CCAMP charter), "No" (should not
>be added) or "-" (don't care).  I'll remind you once again that not
>all items will make it onto the new charter.
>
>Please keep this subject line (simply reply to this mail).  The
>deadline is Friday Dec 3, 17:00 PST.
>
>1) MPLS-GMPLS migration
>2) GMPLS interoperability issues
>3a) should the IETF take on L1VPNs?
>3b) if yes to 3a, should this be done in CCAMP?
>4) Waveband switching
>5) Control plane work
>6) Decoder ring for addresses
>7) Deployment considerations for GMPLS
>8) PCE requirements
>9) QoS control
>
>A rough idea of what each of the above entails follows.
>
>1) MPLS-GMPLS migration
>	implementation shift from "MPLS" objects to "GMPLS" objects
>	BCP on deployment migration for the same
>
>2) GMPLS interoperability issues
>	what addresses to use where
>	nits/clarifications of the specs
>	guidelines for path computation & constraints
>	survay
>
>3) L1VPN work items
>	identify protocol extensions needed
>	state what can already be done with what we have
>	do the actual protocol work for requirements that are not met
>	liaisons to SG13 as needed
>
>5) Control plane work
>	resiliency
>	graceful shutdown
>
>6) Decoder ring for addresses
>	for each address field, identify its nature and ITU equivalent
>	(may overlap with part of (2))
>
>
>4, 7-9 are obvious or have been elaborated on the mailing list.
>
>Kireeti.
>-------
>
>PS: The topic of GTTP has carefully been avoided.  More later.
>
>
>  
>