[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New charter
Hi Kireeti,
I support them rechartered in CCAMP WG and am personally
interested in MPLS/GMPLS migration and deployment consideration
of GMPLS to accelerate actual GMPLS deployment.
CCAMP WG is suitable for discussing about L1VPN.
With best regards,
tomo
----------------------------------
Tomohiro Otani
KDDI R&D Laboratories, Inc.
----------------------------------
Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kireeti Kompella wrote:
>
>> If you have suggested charter updates, please send them to Adrian
>> and me.
>
>Thanks all for your input. I have the following items; for each,
>please say "Yes" (should be added to CCAMP charter), "No" (should not
>be added) or "-" (don't care). I'll remind you once again that not
>all items will make it onto the new charter.
>
>Please keep this subject line (simply reply to this mail). The
>deadline is Friday Dec 3, 17:00 PST.
>
>1) MPLS-GMPLS migration
>2) GMPLS interoperability issues
>3a) should the IETF take on L1VPNs?
>3b) if yes to 3a, should this be done in CCAMP?
>4) Waveband switching
>5) Control plane work
>6) Decoder ring for addresses
>7) Deployment considerations for GMPLS
>8) PCE requirements
>9) QoS control
>
>A rough idea of what each of the above entails follows.
>
>1) MPLS-GMPLS migration
> implementation shift from "MPLS" objects to "GMPLS" objects
> BCP on deployment migration for the same
>
>2) GMPLS interoperability issues
> what addresses to use where
> nits/clarifications of the specs
> guidelines for path computation & constraints
> survay
>
>3) L1VPN work items
> identify protocol extensions needed
> state what can already be done with what we have
> do the actual protocol work for requirements that are not met
> liaisons to SG13 as needed
>
>5) Control plane work
> resiliency
> graceful shutdown
>
>6) Decoder ring for addresses
> for each address field, identify its nature and ITU equivalent
> (may overlap with part of (2))
>
>
>4, 7-9 are obvious or have been elaborated on the mailing list.
>
>Kireeti.
>-------
>
>PS: The topic of GTTP has carefully been avoided. More later.
>
>
>
>