RE: Draft minutes from Tove: draft-dachille-inter-region-path-setup-04.txt

["Vishal Sharma" <v.sharma@ieee.org>]

Hi Adrian,

Some comments, observations, and questions in-line,
in two successive emails.

Here's the first.

-Vishal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk]
> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 10:40 AM
> To: Ugo Monaco
> Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Vishal Sharma; Alessio D'Achille; Daniele Alì;
> Marco Listanti; Tove Madsen
> Subject: Re: Draft minutes from Tove
>

<snip>

> >  > 12. Related to 11.  Protection for Inter-AS tunnels -
> Decnodder - Cristel
> >  > Pelsser
> >  >
> >
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-decnodder-ccamp-interas
-protectio
>  > n-00.txt>
>  > -- Differs from 11, addresses requirements from TEWG draft
>
> We want stress that ARO addresses requirements from the TEWG draft too

> OK. This is a punctuation error in the minutes.

>"-- Differs from 11, addresses requirements from TEWG draft"

>should read

>"-- Differs from 11
> --Addresses requirements from TEWG draft"

>We will update the minutes.

I think it would be good for the minutes to then also note that
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dachille-inter-region-path-setup-0
4.txt

also directly address the requirements from the TE requirements
draft, as below.

> (draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req-09.txt), in particular is in
> accordance with Section:
>
> 5.1.1. Inter-AS MPLS TE Operations and Interoperability
> 5.1.5.  Re-optimization
> 5.1.8. Scalability and Hierarchical LSP Support
> 5.1.11. Extensibility
> 6. Security Considerations
>
> This was also the basis on which we got some good feedback
> from the service provider community in the extensive discussions
> before, during, and after Seoul.
> May be we need to better point out this issue in the next version of the
> draft.