Re: Draft minutes from Tove: draft-dachille-inter-region-path-setup-04.txt

["Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>]

Vishal,

This is a good point that you should definitely be raising in the discussions about your
draft.

I can't however, update the minutes to reflect things you would have liked to have been
said at the meeting.

A

> >  > -- Differs from 11, addresses requirements from TEWG draft
> >
> > We want stress that ARO addresses requirements from the TEWG draft too
>
> > OK. This is a punctuation error in the minutes.
>
> >"-- Differs from 11, addresses requirements from TEWG draft"
>
> >should read
>
> >"-- Differs from 11
> > --Addresses requirements from TEWG draft"
>
> >We will update the minutes.
>
> I think it would be good for the minutes to then also note that
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dachille-inter-region-path-setup-0
> 4.txt
>
> also directly address the requirements from the TE requirements
> draft, as below.
>
> > (draft-ietf-tewg-interas-mpls-te-req-09.txt), in particular is in
> > accordance with Section:
> >
> > 5.1.1. Inter-AS MPLS TE Operations and Interoperability
> > 5.1.5.  Re-optimization
> > 5.1.8. Scalability and Hierarchical LSP Support
> > 5.1.11. Extensibility
> > 6. Security Considerations
> >
> > This was also the basis on which we got some good feedback
> > from the service provider community in the extensive discussions
> > before, during, and after Seoul.
> > May be we need to better point out this issue in the next version of the
> > draft.