RE: draft-ayyangar-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te-00.txt to WG status?

["Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS" <dbrungard@att.com>]

Answers below-
Deborah 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 9:43 AM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Cc: Kireeti Kompella; Arthi Ayyangar; JP Vasseur
Subject: draft-ayyangar-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te-00.txt to WG status?

Hi,

As documented in the minutes from Washington DC, we discussed whether to
make this draft
an WG document.

A show of hands in the room indicated that there were no objections but
that not many had
read the draft. So, two questions for the list...

Should this become a WG draft?
> Yes

Is it fine to include stitching in this draft, or does the wider
applicability of
stitching mean that it should be pulled out into a separate draft?
>If wider applicability, then a separate draft, with links to the other
draft (and hopefully both drafts progress in-sync)

Thanks,
Adrian