Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hi,
As documented in the minutes from Washington DC, we discussed whether to make this draft an WG document.
A show of hands in the room indicated that there were no objections but that not many had read the draft. So, two questions for the list...
Should this become a WG draft?
yes
As wider applicability foreseen, it should be better for process and clarity purpose to have a separate draft.Is it fine to include stitching in this draft, or does the wider applicability of stitching mean that it should be pulled out into a separate draft?
Thanks, Adrian