[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doubts on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01
- To: mohanss <mohanss@huawei.com>
- Subject: Re: Doubts on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01
- From: Rahul Aggarwal <rahul@juniper.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:26:13 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
- In-reply-to: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAKpqEfWbFb02tkV1Hmkg2asKAAAAQAAAAB0ACFPtIWkGhm6bCb/ZEfQEAAAAA@huawei.com>
- References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAKpqEfWbFb02tkV1Hmkg2asKAAAAQAAAAB0ACFPtIWkGhm6bCb/ZEfQEAAAAA@huawei.com>
Hi Mohan,
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, mohanss wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have few doubts regarding the following drafts.
>
> Draft: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01.txt
> 1) In this draft what is the role of sub-group ID. What will be the
> value of this? I mean IP address or some other number? If it is IP
> address which one?
>
The sub-group ID is intended to distinguish different Path Messages tha
are signaling sub-LSPs for the same P2MP LSP. Its value is chosen by the
originator of the PathMessage and doesn't have to be an IP address.
> 2) Any vendor is already supporting this feature?
> Setup of RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs? Can anyone list the vendors?
>
I will respond offline to this.
rahul
> 3) Which one of the following is best suitable for CSPF in P2MP?
> Core Based Trees, Reverse Path Forwarding and Spanning trees?
>
> If available, please send the links for the same.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> -Mohan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>