[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Doubts on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01



Hi Mohan,

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, mohanss wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have few doubts regarding the following drafts.
>
> Draft: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01.txt
> 1) In this draft what is the role of sub-group ID. What will be the
> value of this? I mean IP address or some other number? If it is IP
> address which one?
>

The sub-group ID is intended to distinguish different Path Messages tha
are signaling sub-LSPs for the same P2MP LSP. Its value is chosen by the
originator of the PathMessage and doesn't have to be an IP address.

> 2) Any vendor is already supporting this feature?
> Setup of RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs? Can anyone list the vendors?
>

I will respond offline to this.

rahul

> 3) Which one of the following is best suitable for CSPF in P2MP?
> Core Based Trees, Reverse Path Forwarding and Spanning trees?
>


> If available, please send the links for the same.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> -Mohan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>