[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Doubts on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01

To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Doubts on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01
From: mohanss <mohanss@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:29:43 +0530
Organization: huawei technlogies
Reply-to: mohanss@huawei.com

Title: Doubts on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01

Hi all,

I have few doubts regarding the following drafts.

Draft: draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01.txt
1) In this draft what is the role of sub-group ID. What will be the value of this? I mean IP address or some other number? If it is IP address which one?

2) Any vendor is already supporting this feature?
Setup of RSVP-TE P2MP LSPs? Can anyone list the vendors?

3) Which one of the following is best suitable for CSPF in P2MP?
Core Based Trees, Reverse Path Forwarding and Spanning trees?

If available, please send the links for the same.

Thanks and Regards,
-Mohan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Doubts on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01
  - From: Rahul Aggarwal <rahul@juniper.net>
- Re: Doubts on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01
  - From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Nortel Networks Statement on IPR claimed in draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: Doubts on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01
Previous by thread: Nortel Networks Statement on IPR claimed in draft-ietf-ccamp-loose-path-reopt-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: Doubts on draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-p2mp-01
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread