RE: WG drafts - My correction

["Zafar Ali" <zali@cisco.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
> [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 7:17 PM
> To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: WG drafts - My correction
> 
> Thanks to those of you who pointed out my mistake on and off the list.
> 
> To set things straight...
> 
> 1. We have already accepted 
> draft-ayyangar-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te as a WG draft and 
> it has been published as draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te
> 
> 2. I have seen consensus for 
> draft-ayyangar-ccamp-lsp-stitching to be published as a WG 
> draft and the authors will submit it as 
> draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-stitching soon
> 
> 3. The name of the third draft is
> draft-vasseur-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp. This is the 
> draft that we need to consider.
> 
> As JP says, he plans to add the sentence "In the context of 
> this draft, the node in charge of any ERO expansion within 
> its domain is always along the inter-domain TE LSP path" to 
> this draft.
> 
> Question: With the addition of this sentence, are we content 
> to accept this draft as a WG draft?

Yes, 

Thanks

Regards... Zafar 

> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>