RE : WG drafts - My correction

["LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN" <jeanlouis.leroux@francetelecom.com>]

>Question: With the addition of this sentence, are we content 
>to accept this draft as a WG draft?

yes

JL

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org 
>[mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] De la part de Adrian Farrel
>Envoyé : mercredi 23 mars 2005 01:17
>À : ccamp@ops.ietf.org
>Objet : WG drafts - My correction
>
>
>Thanks to those of you who pointed out my mistake on and off the list.
>
>To set things straight...
>
>1. We have already accepted 
>draft-ayyangar-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te as a WG draft and it 
>has been published as draft-ietf-ccamp-inter-domain-rsvp-te
>
>2. I have seen consensus for 
>draft-ayyangar-ccamp-lsp-stitching to be published as a WG 
>draft and the authors will submit it as 
>draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-stitching soon
>
>3. The name of the third draft is 
>draft-vasseur-ccamp-inter-domain-pd-path-comp. This is the 
>draft that we need to consider.
>
>As JP says, he plans to add the sentence "In the context of 
>this draft, the node in charge of any ERO expansion within its 
>domain is always along the inter-domain TE LSP path" to this draft.
>
>Question: With the addition of this sentence, are we content 
>to accept this draft as a WG draft?
>
>Thanks,
>Adrian
>
>
>