[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WG last calls



Hi,Adrian 
 From draft-ietf-ccamp-crankback-04.txt ,section 4.5, the number of crankback
rerouting is limited, so there will be a result: there is another LSP,but for the reason
of limiting, the path may be not found.
I think sometimes it is unacceptable.The LSP may be prefered to enhancing performance.

Regards,
Zhang

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kireeti Kompella" <kireeti@juniper.net>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:37 PM
Subject: WG last calls


> Hi,
> 
> This is to initiate CCAMP WG last calls on:
> 
> draft-ietf-ccamp-crankback-04.txt
> 
> and
> 
> draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-exclude-route-03.txt
> 
> Please send your comments to the list (preferably) or to the authors
> by April 14, 23:59 GMT (which is when the last calls end).
> 
> Thanks,
> Kireeti.
> -------
>