--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
In the draft draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-functional-04.txt, in the section about Reversion.
It is said:
"Reversion implies that a working path remains allocated to the LSP that
was originally routed over it even after a failure."
This requirement may hold true for non-PSC networks, and may not be required in PSC.
How can RSVP support this?? I mean it may totally violate RSVP-TE standard.
As though the failure has happened and LSP should not be deleted.
Plz let me know your view on this.
Regards,
Amit.
--- End Message ---