hi
[snip]
>> Can you say why you think this is so?
>> Looking at draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-recovery-e2e-signaling-03.txt I do not
>> see anything that forces this limitation. In fact, it would be hard to
>> offer 1:n protection with such a scheme.
> In my understanding, the ASSOCIATION ID of ASSOCIATION Object only
> relates protected LSP and protecting LSPs.
this object includes a Association Type field (16 bits) that indicates the
type of association being identified, for recovery purposes the Type is 1;
so in the present case (i.e. base VC grouping) a new Type value would be
definedIB>> Agree 100%
Igor
[snip]
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com