[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter



Hi Adrian,
 
Graceful shutdown, a method for explicitly notifying a set of nodes that either a Link or an entire node will remove itself from the network or the protocol is going to be disabled for a link or a node, had good response when kireeti polled for charter updates some times back. We have been waiting for a charter update to move with this ID (draft-ali-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-xx.txt). I think got missed in your list. can you please include this work item in the milestone list as well. 
 
Thanks
 
Regards... Zafar  


From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 7:28 AM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Cc: zinin@psg.com; 'Kireeti Kompella'
Subject: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter

Hi,

Please find attached a file that contains:

- a set of proposed *draft* milestones
- a discussion of why there are so many milestones
- a high-level explanation of the work items.

Note that this looks like a lot of milestones, but please read the text on this issue in the attached file. The bottom line is that this is a product of micro management where I have tried to identify all of the I-Ds that we might produce to cover the referenced work, and where I have placed two (sometimes three) milestones for each I-D.

This micro-management may be over the top, and represents a full pendulum swing from the previous style of CCAMP milestones, but in the light of the hiatus of the last 12 months, i think this may be beneficial and might achieve rapid forwards movement.

I would welcome your (constructive!) comments.

Notes:
- Why isn't my I-D also cited as input material?
  No insult intended. The current list is simply there to
  show the ADs that work is already in progress. All I-Ds
  will be used as input.     
- Why isn't my pet topic included?
  Are you sure it is not there between the lines? This
  list of milestones isn't completely proscriptive.
 
The objective is to have the WG agreed on the milestones that it wants to commit to by the end of August.
 
Thanks,
Adrian