Hi Adrian,
Looks like a detailed, ambitious constructive action plan.
Two comments:
(1) Analysis of inter-domain issues for disjoint and protected paths - Informational I-D to close off the topic and devolve to PCE * first version of WG draft * submit for IESG review
Could you briefly elaborate on this item ?
(2) May be in the same bucket as draft-ali-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown, you may want to add draft-leroux-ccamp-ctrl-saturation-01.txt ?
thanks.
JP. On Aug 16, 2005, at 7:28 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: Hi,
Please find attached a file that contains:
- a set of proposed *draft* milestones - a discussion of why there are so many milestones - a high-level explanation of the work items.
Note that this looks like a lot of milestones, but please read the text on this issue in the attached file. The bottom line is that this is a product of micro management where I have tried to identify all of the I-Ds that we might produce to cover the referenced work, and where I have placed two (sometimes three) milestones for each I-D.
This micro-management may be over the top, and represents a full pendulum swing from the previous style of CCAMP milestones, but in the light of the hiatus of the last 12 months, i think this may be beneficial and might achieve rapid forwards movement.
I would welcome your (constructive!) comments.
Notes: - Why isn't my I-D also cited as input material? No insult intended. The current list is simply there to show the ADs that work is already in progress. All I-Ds will be used as input. - Why isn't my pet topic included? Are you sure it is not there between the lines? This list of milestones isn't completely proscriptive. The objective is to have the WG agreed on the milestones that it wants to commit to by the end of August. Thanks, Adrian<ccamp-milestones.txt> |