Re: MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-09.txt

[<jcucchiara@mindspring.com>]

----- Original Message -----
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <jcucchiara@mindspring.com>; Tom Petch <nwnetworks@dial.pipex.com>;
Thomas D. Nadeau <tnadeau@cisco.com>; <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Cc: <bwijnen@lucent.com>
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 6:40 AM
Subject: Re: MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-09.txt


> Hi Joan,
>
> > Please add a note as to why the bits are reversed for the managed
> object.
>
> No, no, no, no! :-)
>
> I said...
>
> > > You are both right.
> > > We have reversed the order of the bits in the IANA MIB and also filled
> the
> > > gap with "reserved" bits.
>
> That means we have changed the order from what it used to be to what you
> have asked for.

Okay, sorry for my confusion.

-Joan


>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>