Re: MIB Dr. review of draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-te-mib-09.txt

["Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>]

    Sorry, just getting back to my emails...

> Hi Tom,
>
>
> > I am still unsure about MSB/LSB in IANAGmplsAdminStatusFlags.   
> > This has
> reflect
>
> > (31) while RFC3471 has reflect as bit 0.
> >
> > As Joan says, "The BITS as specified look backwards when viewing the
> TLV".
>
> > This is fine if one is MSB, the other LSB (although that might be  
> > worth
> adding a
>
> > note about).
> You are both right.
> We have reversed the order of the bits in the IANA MIB and also  
> filled the
> gap with "reserved" bits.
    Just a clarification Tom P., we will add a statement to the
object explaining what Adrian posted above, which will hopefully
allay future questions on the object.

    --Tom