RE: Two Drafts for Resilience of Control Plane

["Zafar Ali \(zali\)" <zali@cisco.com>]

Hi All,

 

I am unable to understand the problem we are trying to solve or fabricate. My control network is IP based and IP has proven resiliency (Internet *does* work), why would I like to take control plan resiliency problem at a layer *above-IP* and complicate my life. Did I miss something?

 

Thanks

 

Regards... Zafar

---

From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Kim Young Hwa
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 6:04 AM
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Two Drafts for Resilience of Control Plane

Dear all,

 

I posted two drafts for the resilience of control plane.

One is for requirements of the resilience of control plane, the other is for a protocol specification as a solution of that .

These are now available at:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kim-ccamp-cpr-reqts-01.txt

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kim-ccamp-accp-protocol-00.txt

 

I want your comments.

 

Regards

 

Young.

 

====================================
Young-Hwa Kim
Principal Member / Ph.D
BcN Research Division, ETRI
Tel:     +82-42-860-5819
Fax:    +82-42-860-5440
e-mail: yhwkim@etri.re.kr
====================================