[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Two Drafts for Resilience of Control Plane

zafar -

Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
Hi All, I am unable to understand the problem we are trying to solve or 
fabricate. My control network is IP based and IP has proven resiliency
(Internet *does* work), why would I like to take control plan resiliency
problem at a layer *above-IP* and complicate my life. Did I miss
something?
... i don't think the issue is to invent new problems but at some point in time it may be become advisable to document the mechanisms available at hand and applicable to support control plane resilience - note they are disseminated in several I-Ds and RFCs today - at least this would prevent from re-discussing periodically this issue while at the end the initial problem has been covered progressively since CCAMP work started 


Thanks
Regards... Zafar 

________________________________

	From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org]
On Behalf Of Kim Young Hwa
	Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 6:04 AM
	To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
	Subject: Two Drafts for Resilience of Control Plane
	
	
	Dear all,
I posted two drafts for the resilience of control plane. 
	One is for requirements of the resilience of control plane, the
other is for a protocol specification as a solution of that .
	These are now available at:
	
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kim-ccamp-cpr-reqts-01.txt
	
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kim-ccamp-accp-protocol-00.txt
I want your comments. Regards Young. ==================================== 
	Young-Hwa Kim
	Principal Member / Ph.D
	BcN Research Division, ETRI
	Tel:     +82-42-860-5819
	Fax:    +82-42-860-5440
	e-mail: yhwkim@etri.re.kr
	====================================
	
<http://umail.etri.re.kr/External_ReadCheck.aspx?email=ccamp@ops.ietf.or
g&name=ccamp%40ops.ietf.org&fromemail=yhwkim@etri.re.kr&messageid=%3C863
0a6db-0c31-49ab-a798-13b0dda04553@etri.re.kr%3E>