[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks

To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks
From: "inoue.ichiro@lab.ntt.co.jp" <inoue.ichiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 21:40:02 +0900
In-reply-to: <5.1.1.9.2.20051222205630.0697e008@imf.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp>
References: <098801c606a2$95ba4900$99849ed9@Puppy> <5.1.1.9.2.20051222205630.0697e008@imf.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp>

In favor.

Ichiro Inoue


>At 21:55 05/12/21 +0000, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>We have a charter milestone to start WG work on a Requirements I-D for
>>MRN/MLN, and also an Evaluation I-D to examine how the current protocols
>>shape up to the challenge.
>>
>>There are two appropriate I-Ds that have been around for a while.
>>
>>draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-03.txt
>>draft-leroux-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-eval-02.txt
>>
>>I propose that we make these WG documents and then give them a thorough
>>review and edit.
>>
>>Opinions please.
>>
>>Yes or no will suffice, but reasons are always nice.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Adrian

References:
- Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks
  - From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
- Re: Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks
  - From: Tomonori TAKEDA <takeda.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks
Next by Date: Re: Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks
Previous by thread: Re: Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks
Next by thread: Re: Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread