in favor. JP. On Dec 21, 2005, at 4:55 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
Hi, We have a charter milestone to start WG work on a Requirements I-D forMRN/MLN, and also an Evaluation I-D to examine how the current protocolsshape up to the challenge. There are two appropriate I-Ds that have been around for a while. draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-03.txt draft-leroux-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-eval-02.txtI propose that we make these WG documents and then give them a thoroughreview and edit. Opinions please. Yes or no will suffice, but reasons are always nice. Thanks, Adrian