[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks
- To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: Opinion on WG drafts for Multi-region/layer networks
- From: Igor Bryskin <i_bryskin@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 06:56:25 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=0b2hpueGUsAa/6vEghLY1q7xdAoG39S+Zp6E64KGiq0vVktjz1ehJeWpgx3FGWm8WHl5V98HuQHRm0t/QQOVO5tLkY5/ks4L60GKUgTvQfwIKB4wPrDtIcV09Jpl1xYZLsJ5aOVVjijagoT7eRmJ9EgaQVICAvha8EF6ZE0KPUg= ;
- In-reply-to: <098801c606a2$95ba4900$99849ed9@Puppy>
Hi,
I believe this work is very important.
Igor
Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
Hi,
We have a charter milestone to start WG work on a Requirements I-D for
MRN/MLN, and also an Evaluation I-D to examine how the current protocols
shape up to the challenge.
There are two appropriate I-Ds that have been around for a while.
draft-shiomoto-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-reqs-03.txt
draft-leroux-ccamp-gmpls-mrn-eval-02.txt
I propose that we make these WG documents and then give them a thorough
review and edit.
Opinions please.
Yes or no will suffice, but reasons are always nice.
Thanks,
Adrian
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo!
Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com