Re: [Pce] FW: Discussions on PCE requirements for GMPLS

[Greg Bernstein <gregb@grotto-networking.com>]

Merging sounds like a good idea to me.

Cheers

Greg

julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com wrote:
> Hello CCAMP.
>
> As described by Fatai below, 2 documents are on the table in the PCE WG to tackle PCE requirements for GMPLS networks. Any feedback that the group may have would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Julien
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fatai Zhang
>
> Hi PCEers
>  
> We have a draft (draft-zhang-pce-reqs-for-tdm-00.txt) in the process. This draft describes some requirements for applying Path Computation Element (PCE) in Time-Division Multiplexing (TDM) networks. 
>  
> I think GMPLS-based TDM networks can be regarded as sub-set of GMPLS networks (for example, GMPLS-based SDH networks), so the requirements described in this draft (PCE for TDM) are sub-set of the requirments for PCE applied in GMPLS networks.
>  
> Therefore, It seems that there may be something overlapped with another draft (draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-00.txt), but there is no discription on these requirements in draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-00.txt.
>  
> In addition, I think it is not a good solution to keep PCE requirements for  GMPLS in a few separate documents, so I think it is natural to incorporate the requirements into draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req-00.txt.
>  
> Any comments or suggestions are welcome and helpful.
>
>
>  
> Thanks
>  
> Fatai
>  
> Advanced Technology Department
> Wireline Networking Business Unit
> Huawei Technologies Co., LTD.
> Huawei Base, Bantian, Longgang,
> Shenzhen 518129 P.R.China
> Tel: +86-755-28972912
> Fax: +86-755-28972935
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
>
>   

--
===================================================
Dr Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking (510) 573-2237