Re: Distribution CPG Protocol - Some Thoughts

[Oliver Spatscheck <spatsch@research.att.com>]

brad cain writes:
 > 
 > 
 > Alex French wrote:
 > > 
 > > I think we may be straying into a discussion of the content routing system
 > > rather than the content distribution peering; valid discussion, but we need
 > > to be clear which problem we're dealing with.
 > 
 > I think there is confusion as to where the content specific
 > information needs to be exchanged in the model.  I believe
 > that in all three types of peering this needs to occur.  

Exactly, I think the confusion originates from the fact that we haven't
identified this protocol as an independent part of the architecture.
This forces us (using our current architecture) to assign it to 
one of the three concepts, distribution, direction, accounting.

We should revise the architecture to account for this.

Oliver