[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Comments on protocol drafts
- To: C C Magnus Gustavsson <mag@lysator.liu.se>
- Subject: Re: [idn] Comments on protocol drafts
- From: RJ Atkinson <rja@inet.org>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:34:29 +0000
- Cc: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 06:34:05 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
At 06:22 15-02-00 , C C Magnus Gustavsson wrote:
>No. The Indoeuropean language family represent a MAJORITY of the
>world.
I do not believe your assertion for a minute.
We will have to agree to disagree on this and just focus on moving forwards.
>In this case I was simply arguing against Hoffmans insinuation that
>European languages are not very important.
All languages are _equally_ important, IMHO. Part of my point about
a language-neutral solution is that we want to avoid a solution that
works well for one language (or language family) at the disadvantage
of other language families. If there needs to be pain, it should be
shared equally.
Ran
rja@inet.org