[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] I don't want 8-bit failures in 2011
- To: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: [idn] I don't want 8-bit failures in 2011
- From: lucid@epa.secret.org
- Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 05:05:29 -0500 (EST)
- Delivery-date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 02:08:15 -0800
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
On 3 Feb 2001, D. J. Bernstein wrote:
> Dave Crocker writes:
> > It is approximately the 10th anniversary of the beginning of the effort to
> > make Internet mail support "international character-sets".
> It has been nearly twenty years since people realized how stupid it was
> to mangle 8-bit mail. But there is still no IETF specification saying
> that it's bad for Sendmail to destroy bytes 128 through 159 in the
> header of a message.
Ok, given that:
IPv6 will requires changes at all of the same layers as IDN from
application to network
http://127.0.0.1/
http://127.1/
http://0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1/
http://::1/
I know of no production IPv6 networks
http://www.ipv6.org/v6-www.html
Production use of IPv6 will take another 5-20 years
Ask your ISP if you can connect to them via IPv6
I doubt they even have IPv6 address space.
Because of this I propose the following idea:
IDN for IPv6 should be implemented in a raw unicode character set aka
just do 8-bit. Until then *ACE or some other solution can be
designed and implemented.
-Bill