Re: [idn] wg milestones update

["James Seng/Personal" <James@Seng.cc>]

Read RFC2026. The WG process should not be stop or delay due to IPR DoS
on the WG.

On the position on dealing with Walid patent, this decision has to come
from the WG (ie individual members), not the co-chairs. We can only
gather the decision from the members to decide how to move forward.

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "J. William Semich" <bill@mail.nic.nu>
To: <idn@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [idn] wg milestones update


> Marc - what is the position on dealing with the Walid patent in this
process?
>
> thanks,
>
> Bill
>
> At 07:32 AM 4/26/2001 -0400, Marc Blanchet wrote:
> >Hi,
> > the milestones in the current charter are overdue. As said during
> >minneapolis, the chairs had the task to propose new milestones to the
> >wg.  Here is our proposal.
> >
> >Marc & James
> >
> >May 01 Submit Requirements I-D to IESG for Informational RFC
> >May 01 WG decision on IDN Protocol
> >May 15 Second version of Comparison I-D
> >Jun 01 Last Call on Comparison I-D
> >Jul 01 Final revision of IDN protocol I-D(s)
> >Aug 08 London IETF: final discussion on IDN protocol I-D(s)
> >Aug 15 Last Call on IDN Protocol I-D(s)
> >Sep 01 Submit Comparison I-D to IESG for Informational RFC
> >Sep 01 Submit Protocol I-D(s) to IESG for standard track RFC
> >
> >
> >
>