[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[idn] Listing utf8 (in)capable parts
- To: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: [idn] Listing utf8 (in)capable parts
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 07:14:29 -0400
- Delivery-date: Fri, 25 May 2001 04:16:29 -0700
- Envelope-to: idn-data@psg.com
I suggest that those interested in moving the discussion of binary only,
or ace plus binary, or ace only, can contribute to making the evaluation
of architectural choices clearer.
The mail could look like this:
To: idn@ops.ietf.org
From: Person with Foo Clue
Subject: Foo (MTA) utf8 status [yes/no/other]
with an optionally non-empty body.
There'd be unformatted but searchable ascii in the idn list archive, anyone
could pretty-print it who wanted to make a (im)possible-to-proceede matrix,
and we could dampen the trivial/intractible assertions slightly.
If this work has already been done I'd appreciate a pointer.
Cheers,
Eric