[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth
> At 13:16 01/07/23 -0500, Eric A. Hall wrote:
>
> [Paul Hoffman wrote:]
>
> > > Not true. ACE names are quite easy to pick out of document content:
> > > they have the name prefixes.
> >
> >This assumes that it wasn't written and stored in transliterated form. I
> >would think that the native format will be the most common for
> >user-written material (especially email bodies), not ACE. This goes
> >against the original argument.
>
> And please let's not forget: There is at least one form where
> if things are going to work, ACE won't be used. That's paper.
> If anybody is so stupid to buy an IDN to put its ACE on paper,
> s/he can of course do that, but I doubt that's what many
> people would want to do.
Just same way as they don't put the real numbers after
1 800 SOMENUMBER (1 800 7663686237). It they want you
to contact them then the ace form is quite likely to
be there as well.
Mark
>
>
> Regards, Martin.
>
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com