[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ace leaking (was: Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth)

To: Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>, liana.ydisg@juno.com
Subject: Re: ace leaking (was: Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth)
From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 18:07:07 +0900
Cc: paf@cisco.com, moore@cs.utk.edu, Marc.Blanchet@viagenie.qc.ca, Mark.Andrews@nominum.com, idn@ops.ietf.org

Well, it can be the same site, but I guess what will happen
quite a bit is that the IDN site(s) will be in the respective
language, and the ASCII site in English, in cases where only
these two variants are done.

Regards,    Martin.

At 13:38 01/07/24 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
>why should you bother keeping two sites, when two domains that refer
>to the same address will suffice?
>
>maybe because it will get you more customers/viewers?
>
>again, it's your choice.
>
> > I agree.  Why should I keep two different sites, when I have a lot
> > of other things to take care of?

Prev by Date: [idn] Forbidden characters
Next by Date: Re: ace leaking (was: Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth)
Prev by thread: Re: ace leaking (was: Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth)
Next by thread: Re: ace leaking (was: Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread