[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ace leaking (was: Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth)
- To: idn@ops.ietf.org
- Subject: Re: ace leaking (was: Re: [idn] Debunking the ACE myth)
- From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 18:39:53 -0500
this mini-debate about registering multiple domain names is really about
marketing. less grandly, it is about convenience for the people you
communicate with.
an organization will choose whatever set of domain name strings it deems
helpful for communicating with various audiences. organizations have
been doing this a long time and there is nothing really special about
domain names, in this regard... as long as we do not impose peculiar
requirements on them.
So,
At 10:39 AM 7/24/2001, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> I am not interested in paying some registry and ISP for hosting an extra
> domain just because
>some people can not type in adiaeresis. I rather expose the ACE and let
>people fight with it (ugly as it is).
is offset by earlier comments about difficulty in finding the right
keystrokes for generating the characters, and your own desire for a way to
type a japanese iDN without having to know how to generate the japanese
characters.
The point is that domain holders will (and do) pay attention to the
conveniences of those who must type their domain names. Those wishing
maximum ease will choose a range of names.
Just as there is www.ca.gov and www.state.ca.us, there will be (multiple
domain names in multiple character sets, for the same organization.)
An entirely different matter would be this standards body doing anything
that required or prevented that choice.
d/
d/
----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg InternetWorking <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.273.6464