Re: [idn] Re: [idn-nameprep] Arabic hyphen-like glyph

[John C Klensin <klensin@research.att.com>]

--On Friday, 27 July, 2001 14:43 +0800 "James Seng/Personal"
<James@Seng.cc> wrote:

> John,
> 
> I do agree an analysis of the security implications are useful
> at least as informational.
> 
> But I need to stress the wg need to proceed with internet
> drafts. We can talk endlessly on ideas in emails but it will
> remains as what it is, ie, email. This is the message I am
> trying to bring across to Lee: Write draft first, then we can
> discuss based upon it.
>...

I hope my note was not taken to imply anything else.  I meant to
suggest that a security-focused draft might receive somewhat
different handling than the "need supporters to post" model for
protocol-focused or process-focused drafts.  I share your view
that we should stop having discussions about things that people
reference, but don't write drafts about.

     john