Re: [idn] WG Update

[liana.ydisg@juno.com]

You are correct on what you have said here.  But
what I have said is correct too.  TC/SC mapping 
are examples of semantic equivalence and 
Unicode has not deal with them. 

So do some TC/SC equivalence in Kanji.  

Liana

On Fri, 5 Oct 2001 19:52:11 -0700 Yves Arrouye <yves@realnames.com>
writes:
> > I disagree Unicode Consortium to the WG dated 02Sept
> > recommendation.
> > 
> > Unicode has been very effective to collect scripts and glyphs
> > of all scripts, and even comes up with Unified CJK character
> > set, which is essential for IDN implementation.  I call this
> >  the FIRST level of look-alike equivalence.
> 
> Unicode does not collect glyphs but characters (and cf. section 2.1 
> of UTR
> #17, http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports/tr17/). This is a 
> fundamental
> property of the Unicode standard. I am everything but a CJK expert, 
> but
> along the same idea, the Han characters were unified because they 
> meant the
> same thing (semantics) not because of glyph similarities.
> 
> YA
>