Re: [idn] Update Charter revision 2

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>]

James,

My goal isn't to delay anything, here. I plan to exercise the LC periods
responsibly, but I don't consider that "delay" as its absence is "haste".

Here is a specific recommendation.

Delete every one of your (caveat, someone else could have written them, etc.)
deltas on the description section.

Delete every one of your (caveat, see above) deltas on the goals section.

This includes leaving the informational memo(s) as part of what this WG is
committed to delivering to the IETF.

What you do with the requirements document is up to you. I suggest you ask
for someone who actually cares and is careful to take over editing of it.
If you do that, then add it to the set of informational memo(s) this WG has
a stake in reporting out.

That is the easy part. The harder part is milestones.

There is (ideally) a set of standards track memos, and a set of informational
track memos. I've given this a lot more thought than the space after the "."
usually conveys. Your drafts and your WG with its "rough consensus" (not mine,
thanks) ought to reach LC between the 1st and 2nd meetings of next year. The
drafts you don't have even started, input methods, namepreps, zonefile, and
the forgotten writing order, and other bits that surface as all the big items
are "solved" should take you and your WG out through the end of the year, and
a really careful basic evaluation memo (revision of Paul's) not quite that
long.

Eric