Re: [idn] Update Charter revision 2

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

No explaination other than asking for deletion?

-James Seng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@nic-naa.net>
To: "James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>
Cc: "Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine" <brunner@nic-naa.net>;
<idn@ops.ietf.org>; <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [idn] Update Charter revision 2


> James,
>
> My goal isn't to delay anything, here. I plan to exercise the LC
periods
> responsibly, but I don't consider that "delay" as its absence is
"haste".
>
> Here is a specific recommendation.
>
> Delete every one of your (caveat, someone else could have written
them, etc.)
> deltas on the description section.
>
> Delete every one of your (caveat, see above) deltas on the goals
section.
>
> This includes leaving the informational memo(s) as part of what this
WG is
> committed to delivering to the IETF.
>
> What you do with the requirements document is up to you. I suggest you
ask
> for someone who actually cares and is careful to take over editing of
it.
> If you do that, then add it to the set of informational memo(s) this
WG has
> a stake in reporting out.
>
> That is the easy part. The harder part is milestones.
>
> There is (ideally) a set of standards track memos, and a set of
informational
> track memos. I've given this a lot more thought than the space after
the "."
> usually conveys. Your drafts and your WG with its "rough consensus"
(not mine,
> thanks) ought to reach LC between the 1st and 2nd meetings of next
year. The
> drafts you don't have even started, input methods, namepreps,
zonefile, and
> the forgotten writing order, and other bits that surface as all the
big items
> are "solved" should take you and your WG out through the end of the
year, and
> a really careful basic evaluation memo (revision of Paul's) not quite
that
> long.
>
> Eric