Re: [idn] An ignorant question about TC<-> SC

["xiang deng" <deng@cnnic.net.cn>]

On Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:37 AM , James Seng/Personal

> > Yes, multiple registrations in DNS is better than do nothing.
> > But, there are still some problems can not solve:
> > 1). Just do one for the SC and one for the TC, it isn't enough.
> Because other
> > person can register mixed TC/SC domain name. How to deal with the
> disputations of
> > registration. Such disputations will not disappear, if we have no real
> solution about it.
> > it's policy issue.
> 
> Such mixed TC/SC is possible but not useful in practice. It is neither
> "TC" or "SC" and using it is fairly complex to use. Perhaps some
> statistic of how many such TC/SC mixed label been registered in practice
> will be useful.

No, in HK and MO and mainland of china, many people use Mixed TC/SC.
This is fact we can not avoid. 

> 
> > 2). multiple registrations in DNS can solve a part of the issue, How
> to solve the
> > delegation issue of subdomain and keep the consistency.
> > it's technology issue.
> 
> Agree.
> 
> > 3). if we provide multiple registration solution for customs, we must
> guarantee the multiple
> > records belong to one custom. but from technology view, we can not
> guarantee it.
> 
> I presumed you mean from a "policy view", not technology because if we
> cannot guarantee from technology view, ie there is no technology, then
> we cannot do so in IDN anyway

No. In current profile of IDNA, there is no technology. 
But this does not mean that there no technology solution, and you  know it, 
but you refuse to accept this fact.

If we can not guarantee the solution satisfy custom's requirement, the answer is:
let user to suffer it, because there hasn't techonolgy solution(as your words) and 
we will push this  defective solution.

Deng xiang