[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [idn] An ignorant question about TC<-> SC
On Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:49 AM, Martin Duerst wrote:
>At 10:06 01/10/28 +0800, xiang deng wrote:
> >On Saturday, October 27, 2001 2:58 PM, Patrik F$BgM(Btstr$B‹N(B wrote:
> > > I have not said it should. I like and appreciate the recommendation the
> > > Unicode Consortium gave the IETF, and that is to _NOT_ do unification of
> > > TC/SC or even try to come up with matching rules.
> > >
> > > Instead, multiple registrations in DNS, one for the SC and one for the TC
> > > version is recommended.
> >
> >Yes, multiple registrations in DNS is better than do nothing.
> >But, there are still some problems can not solve:
> >1). Just do one for the SC and one for the TC, it isn't enough. Because other
> >person can register mixed TC/SC domain name. How to deal with the
> >disputations of
> >registration. Such disputations will not disappear, if we have no real
> >solution about it.
> >it's policy issue.
> This is a valid concern. It is ultimately a policy issue. But
> it should be possible to produce some data/guidelines (e.g. as
> an informational RFC) that registrars/registries can adopt.
> It is much easier in such a context to deal with 1-n correspondences
> than it is if an actual mapping is required.
Thanks.
> >2). multiple registrations in DNS can solve a part of the issue, How to
> >solve the
> >delegation issue of subdomain and keep the consistency.
> >it's technology issue.
> I'm not really a DNS expert, but I think with something called
> CNAME or DNAME, there is a very easy solution that will keep
> consistency.
No, we can't keep consistency.
Mr. James has agree with my opinion.
> >3). if we provide multiple registration solution for customs, we must
> >guarantee the multiple
> >records belong to one custom. but from technology view, we can not
> >guarantee it.
> It's the customer's job to do that, and the registrar's job
> to help them. No need for this WG to do anything.
If the fact is as your said. If a user register a domain name which include
Chinese characters, he must register all variant forms of the domain name.
Then he can protect his intelligent property of this domain name.
why? just because he want register a Chinese domain name?
This answer will not satisfy any person.
Deng xiang