[idn] Re: [JET-member 443] Re: Fw: Re: new members invitation

[=?utf-8?B?dHNlbmdsbUDoqIjntrLkuK3lv4Mu5Lit5aSnLnR3?= <tsenglm@cc.ncu.edu.tw>]

> > TC/SC tables are just less than 10K, while NFKC/Legacy/Font
> requirements
> > is much higher. implementation complexity is for engineers.
> > but, deployment costs are transferred to innocent end users.
>
> I am not going to argue for or against TC/SC here. I am stuck in the
> middle myself, torn between been a Chinese and been a co-chair for IDN.
>
> But the arguments for inclusive of TC/SC or not should be done on a pure
> technical evaluation basis in IETF. Economy arguments as above is not a
> factor for consideration.
>
> This is why it is known as engineering trade off, not economy trade off.
>
> -James Seng
>
James:
             Let us to know what is pure technical evaluation basis in your
mind as you are a co-chair in an IETF working group.
             If an Engineering Requirement is not related to the user's cost
and what are user need that must be a very interest projects.  I think many
members in IDN WG of IETF also like to know the detail .  You give me a very
strange impression of IETF.  Can someone in IETF can help more ?

L.M.Tseng