Re: [idn] An ignorant question about TC<-> SC

["xiang deng" <deng@cnnic.net.cn>]

On Monday, October 29, 2001 1:27 PM, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
 
> Why not, indeed? No one here is saying that it should not be done. We 
> are saying that it should not be mandated in a technical 
> specification. There are many types of non-technical specifications 
> that would be very useful here. We have been told that the JET group 
> is coming out with one Real Soon Now, so that might address the 
> problem in a suitable fashion.

I'm not sure what's your meaning.  I always hear two voices:
1. go to UTC.
the requirements are:
(1) preserve the characteristic of TC /SC.
(2) compare without care of TC/SC.
TC and SC are different character, there needn't mapping from 
TC(SC) to SC (TC), it will make a character disappear. 

2.two records solution, one is SC form and the other is TC fom.
it's not applicable.

Deng xiang