[idn] Re: [JET-member 473] Re: Fw: Re: new members invitation

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

> It wasn't my intention to misrepresent you. Please represent yourself.
>
> Why is SC/TC "economic" and not "technical"?

This is why this thread should never be in IDN WG in the first place
because there are so many discussion which was never even in this group.
It is a carried over from JET list.

I did *not* say SC/TC is "economy". Deng bought up arguments on why
TC/SC is neccessary because of "economy cost" in JET list. I responsed
to say that "economy cost" is generally not a consideration for IETF.

I feel there is no need to continue this discussion in the IDN WG until
we have the draft they promised. If you wish to continue, then please
feel free to do so in the JET list where the original discussion have
taken place.

-James Seng