[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [idn] Re: stringprep and unassigned code points



--On 01-10-29 21.15 -0800 Yves Arrouye <yves@realnames.com> wrote:

> But it
> is still possible to generate perfectly legal Nameprepped data from an
> older standard that cannot be matched agains the same data Nameprepped
> from a more recent revision. 

Wrong. See the specification of stringprep, section 6.

   paf