Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified Chinese Conversion[version01]

["Kent Karlsson" <kentk@md.chalmers.se>]

> For the benefit 1, people can use Kanji or Hanja to interconnet amoung TC
> and SC.
> For 2, TSCONV intend to reduce 2^n , every one do not have to register 2^n
> For 3,  every one need reliable and predicable hostname resolving
> 
> > 3. TC/SC is not a 2^n problem. It is closer to n*2 to n*4 problem.
> 
> Why is n*2 or n*4?  It is possible maximum 2^n problem.

In the "testbed" registration data, how many actually registered "names"
*do* mix SC and TC in *one* name?  And, of course, how many
SC or TC names are registered?

The registrations done people involved with the SC/TC discussion here,
or people/organisations/companies somehow associated with them
should be disqualified in the counting of such names, so as to remove
any irrelevant and possibly biased registrations.

I don't think that "testbed" data should wander into mapping tables for
IDN of any sort.  I'd just like to find out if there is an actual problem or not.


        Kind regards
        /kent k