Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified Chinese Conversion[version01]

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

> > Okay, in others words, the two source you reference are exactly
> > identitical?
> >
> Not correct !
>         The  PRC-SC is one of the variants in the dictionary.  But the
> PRC-SC is not  arbitary created , they still based on some rule. The
> dictionary verified all sources of variants . They are not identical.

Okay, I hearing different answer...but anyway, if that is the case,
there are two souce as you said and they are not identical. How do you
put the two source into a single table? What is the policy?

For example, I notice U+56FD & U+570B (the "guo" which Ted mention) just
suddenly disappear in the latest draft. Who made that decision and how
is it done? What policy this authority adopts?

>           Sorry ,  it is a goverment's documents of PRC , so we can
not
> answer the "why" problems.  The first source  is at 1956 , the
referenced
> documents fixed in 1964.  It is re-announced in 1986.

The tables are distributed to teachers actually for education purposes.

-James Seng