[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified Chinese Conversion[version01]



Dear James:
Subject: Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified Chinese
Conversion[version01]


> > > Okay, in others words, the two source you reference are exactly
> > > identitical?
> > >
> > Not correct !
> >         The  PRC-SC is one of the variants in the dictionary.  But the
> > PRC-SC is not  arbitary created , they still based on some rule. The
> > dictionary verified all sources of variants . They are not identical.
>
> Okay, I hearing different answer...but anyway, if that is the case,
> there are two souce as you said and they are not identical. How do you
> put the two source into a single table? What is the policy?
>
> For example, I notice U+56FD & U+570B (the "guo" which Ted mention) just
> suddenly disappear in the latest draft. Who made that decision and how
> is it done? What policy this authority adopts?
>
         Do not forget we are discussed it in JET meeting , our Japan
friends they have some worry or they can not make sure the relation in
(PRC-SC/J-SC ,  JTC/TC) pair.  For Example , like  U+56FD U+570B. This draft
is proposed it will be work in the IDNA AMC-Z-encoder, so these pair that
will influence other people are reserved for further discussions  to make
sure it  and we keep the principle to respect to each others. So,  they are
moved from equivalence  pair  set  to  checking set by JPNIC .
        The draft has one goal to reduce 2^N records problems as possible,
reduced it to one by TC/SC 1-1 mapping and reduced  them  to All-TC  or
All-SC for 1-n mapping are  the possible approach.  Whether  the pair
(PRC-SC/J-SC, JTC/TC) is 1-1 mapping  or not can be verified by many existed
documents. But if  some NIC still want to treat them as total  different ,
then we should to find a way to let them  MUST be  used as  all-TC or all-SC
as you have suggested .
        The  original (SC, TC) pair is keep for checking reference , but if
one character has different meanning and usage in different CJK area, the
relation of 1-1 mapping can be  reduced to checking-state to let CJK people
can keep their local need and also to match the ALL-SC, ALL-TC approach.

L.M.Tseng