Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified Chinese Conversion[version01]

["James Seng/Personal" <jseng@pobox.org.sg>]

>         The  original (SC, TC) pair is keep for checking reference ,
but if
> one character has different meanning and usage in different CJK area,
the
> relation of 1-1 mapping can be  reduced to checking-state to let CJK
people
> can keep their local need and also to match the ALL-SC, ALL-TC
approach.

Okay, let me try to see if I can get this right on the table mappings:

1. The original source of the table mapping is from A Complete List of
Simplified Chinese Characters and Dictonary of Chinese Characters
Variant.

2. JET members have adopted these tables, combined them into a single
tables.

3. JET members then later remove all conflicting cases with Japanese &
Korean pairs from the tables.

If these are true, then JET could be considered as the authority for the
tables mappings. As such, it is important for JET to explain the policy
and stability consideration of the table, probably in the next revision
of the tsconv draft.

-James Seng