Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified Chinese Conversion[version01]

[Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>]

> 2. JET members have adopted these tables, combined them into a single
> tables.

That was my understanding at the October JET meeting.

> 3. JET members then later remove all conflicting cases with Japanese &
> Korean pairs from the tables.

Ditto.

> If these are true, then JET could be considered as the authority for the
> tables mappings.

s/If these are true, then//
s/could be considered as/is/

>              ... As such, it is important for JET to explain the policy
> and stability consideration of the table

While JET may, as a collective exercise, or individual JET members may,
the IETF collectively, and this WG, have no more business "peeking under
the covers" of JET than it does of the UTC.

Our interest is in the necessity, and sufficiency, of the table, for the
purposes stated, and nothing else.

Eric