Re: [idn] draft about Tradition and Simplified ChineseConversion[version01]

[Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>]

--On 2001-11-17 19.27 -0500 Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
<brunner@nic-naa.net> wrote:

>>              ... As such, it is important for JET to explain the policy
>> and stability consideration of the table
> 
> While JET may, as a collective exercise, or individual JET members may,
> the IETF collectively, and this WG, have no more business "peeking under
> the covers" of JET than it does of the UTC.

What James asked for was a description about the plan/policy for stability
of the tables, the same kind of statement we have got from UTC. For
Nameprep to work, it is important to know that the tables will never change
for assigned codepoints in the Unicode Tables. I.e. he asked exactly the
same thing we have asked UTC for the tables we get from them.

   paf